Dear Friend of Radio Liberty,
“. . . there also exists another alliance – at first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well-grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our Communist leaders and your capitalists. This alliance is not new. The very famous Armand Hammer, who is flourishing here today, laid the basis for this when he made the first exploratory trip into Russia, still in Lenin’s time, in the very first years of the Revolution.”
Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, July 8, 1975. 
“And if today the Soviet Union has powerful military and police forces – in a country which is by contemporary standards poor – they are used to crush our movement for freedom in the Soviet Union – and we have western capital to thank for this also.”
“While much of the world remains focused on the Third World’s debt crisis, slack export earnings and a tightening of commercial credit flows have created major foreign debt problems for the Eastern European region. Total debt owed by the region, including the Soviet Union, stood at about $138 billion at the end of 1986.”
Samantha Sparks, Multinational Monitor, November/December 1987 
“. . . Ex-Im Bank has been active in developing Russia’s oil and gas industry. Almost 50 per cent of our portfolio in Russia is in this area. . . .
We have helped support modernization efforts of more than a dozen oil companies with medium- and long-term financing, and we are looking at several pipeline projects that would help bring Russian oil and gas to market.”
Jeffrey L. Miller, Senior Vice President, Export-Import Bank of the United States, July 22, 2004 
Last month’s Radio Liberty letter reproduced the address that Professor Antony Sutton delivered to the Republican Platform Committee in 1972 (during the Vietnam War) which revealed the U.S. was funding the Soviet Union, the Soviet Union was sending weapons to North Vietnam, North Vietnam was sending weapons to the Viet Cong, and the Viet Cong were killing American soldiers in the rice paddies and villages of South Vietnam.  Why did that happen? Because the CFR-Globalists who controlled the U.S. State Department wanted to prolong the Vietnam War so they could continue the social revolution that was under way in the U.S. at that time. 
Very little has changed – except the name of the enemy. Today the U.S. funds Pakistan, Pakistan funds the ISI (Pakistani Intelligence), the ISI funds the Taliban, and Taliban soldiers are killing American servicemen in the poppy fields and villages of Afghanistan.  Why isn’t the U.S. military allowed to win the war in Afghanistan? If the U.S. won the war, how could we justify stationing U.S. troops in the Middle East permanently. 
A similar situation exists in regard to the former Soviet Union. Despite the fact that Russia is the largest producer of oil and natural gas in the world, and has almost $240 billion in foreign reserves, the U.S. is currently sending almost $2 billion a year to the 12 states of the former Soviet Union. Russia received $85 million in 2005 and $80 million in 2006, Chechnya (which is part of Russia) received a $5 million supplement in 2005, and the Ukraine received $78.6 million in 2005, $82.2 million in 2006, and a $60 million supplement in 2005.  Why is that important? Because Russia is arming Iran and Syria, Iran and Syria are arming Hamas and Hezbollah, and the sophisticated weapons that Russia is sending to Iran, Syria, and the terrorist organization will be used against Israel and the U.S. during the coming war in the Middle East. Why are the CFR-Globalists financing former Soviet Union states that are ruthless dictatorships, and Russia which is funding our enemies? Are the CFR-Globalists stupid? Are they uninformed? Do they have a “secret agenda?” 
You cannot understand the tragic events that are taking place throughout the world today, or the terrible events that lie ahead, unless you understand the alliance that exists between the leaders of the communist world, and the CFR-Globalists who control our nation. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn discussed that relationship when he addressed the AFL-CIO convention in Washington, D.C. on June 30, 1975, but he didn’t understand it. Since Alexandr Solzhenitsyn’s June 30, 1975, address is not readily available on the Internet, the first segment of his talk is reproduced in this letter:
* * *
June 30, 1975
“Most of those present here today are workers. Creative workers. And I myself having spent many years of my life as a stone cutter, as a foundryman, as a manual worker, in the name of all who have shared this forced labor with me, like the two Gulag prisoners whom you just saw, and on behalf of those who are doing forced labor in our country, I can start my speech today with the greeting: “Brothers!” “Brothers in labor.”
And not to forget, also, the many honored guests present here tonight, let me add: “Ladies and Gentlemen!”
“Workers of the world unite.” Who of us has not heard this slogan, which has been sounding through the world for 125 years? Today you can find it in any Soviet pamphlet as well as in every issue of Pravda. But never have the leaders of the Communist revolution in the Soviet Union made application of these words sincerely and in their full meaning. When many lies have accumulated over the decades, we forget the radical and basic lie which is not on the leaves of the tree, but at its very roots.
Now, it’s almost impossible to remember or to believe. . . . For instance, I recently published – had reprinted – a pamphlet from the year 1918. This was a precise record of a meeting of all representatives of the Petrograd factories, that being the city known in our country as the ‘cradle of the Revolution.’
I repeat, this was March, 1918 – only four months after the October Revolution – and all the representatives of the Petrograd factories were cursing the Communists, who had deceived them in all of their promises.
What is more, not only had they abandoned Petrograd to cold and hunger, themselves having fled from Petrograd to Moscow, but had given orders to machine-gun the crowds of workers in the courtyards of the factories who were demanding the election of independent factory committees.
Let me remind you this was March, 1918. Scarcely anyone now can recall the crushing of the Petrograd strikes in 1921, or the shooting of workers in Kolpino in the same year.
Among the leadership, the Central Committee of the Communist Party, at the beginning of the Revolution, all were emigree intellectuals who had returned, after the uprisings had already broken out in Russia, in order to carry through the Communist Revolution. One of them was a genuine worker, a highly skilled lathe operator until the last day of his life. This was Alexander Shliapnikov. Who knows that name today? Precisely because he expressed the true interests of the workers within the Communist leadership. . . . In the years before the Revolution it was Shliapnikov who ran the whole Communist Party in Russia – not Lenin, who was an emigree. . . . In 1921, he headed the Workers’ Opposition which was charging the Communist leadership with betraying the workers’ interests, with crushing and oppressing the proletariat and transforming itself into a bureaucracy.
Shliapnikov disappeared from sight. He was arrested somewhat later and since he firmly stood his ground he was shot in prison and his name is perhaps unknown to most people here today. But I remind you: Before the Revolution the head of the Communist Party of Russia was Shliapnikov, not Lenin.
Since that time, the working class has never been able to stand up for its rights, and in distinction from all the western countries our working class only receives what they hand out to it. It only gets handouts. It can not defend its simplest, everyday interests, and the least strike for pay or for better living conditions is viewed as counterrevolutionary. Thanks to the closed nature of the Soviet system, you have probably never heard of the textile strikes in 1930 in Ivanovo, or of the 1961 worker unrest, in Murom and Alexandrovo, nor the major workers’ uprising in Novocherkassk in 1962 – this in the time of Khrushchev, after the thaw.
This story will shortly be published in detail in your country in Gulag Archipelago, volume 3. It is a story of how workers went in a peaceful demonstration to the Party City Committee, carrying portraits of Lenin, to request a change in economic conditions. They fired at them with machine guns and dispersed the crowds with tanks. No family dared even to collect its wounded and dead, but all were taken away in secret by the authorities.
Precisely to those present here I don’t have to explain that in our country, since the Revolution, there’s never been such a thing as a free trade union.
The leaders of the British trade unions are free to play the unworthy game of visiting the so-called trade unions and receiving visits in return. But the AFL-CIO has never given in to these illusions.
The American workers’ movement has never allowed itself to be blinded and mistaken slavery for freedom. And I, today, on behalf of all of our oppressed people, thank you for this!
When liberal thinkers and wise men of the West, who had forgotten the meaning of the word ‘liberty’, were swearing that in the Soviet Union there were no concentration camps at all, the American Federation of Labor published in 1947, a map of our concentration camps, and on behalf of all of the prisoners of those times, I want to thank the American workers’ movement for this! But just as we feel ourselves your allies here, there also exists another alliance – at first glance a strange one, a surprising one – but if you think about it, in fact, one which is well-grounded and easy to understand. This is the alliance between our Communist leaders and your capitalists.
This alliance is not new. The very famous Armand Hammer, who is flourishing here today, laid the basis for this when he made the first exploratory trip into Russia, still in Lenin’s time, in the very first years of the Revolution. He was extremely successful in this intelligence mission and since that time for all these 50 years, we observe continuous and steady support by the businessmen of the West of the Soviet Communist leaders.
Their clumsy and awkward economy, which could never overcome its own difficulties by itself, is continually getting material and technological assistance. The major construction projects in the initial five- year plan were built exclusively with American technology and materials. Even Stalin recognized that two-thirds of what was needed was obtained from the West. And if today the Soviet Union has powerful military and police forces – in a country which is by contemporary standards poor – they are used to crush our movement for freedom in the Soviet Union – and we have western capital to thank for this also.
Let me remind you of a recent incident which some of you may have seen in the newspapers, although others might have missed it: Certain of your businessmen, on their own initiative, established an exhibition of criminological technology in Moscow. This was the most recent and elaborate technology, which here, in your country, is used to catch criminals, to bug them, to spy on them, to photograph them, to tail them, to identify criminals. This was taken to Moscow, to an exhibition, in order that the Soviet KGB agents could study it, as if not understanding what sort of criminals, who would be hunted by the KGB.
The Soviet government was extremely interested in this technology, and decided to purchase it. And your businessmen were quite willing to sell it. Only when a few sober voices here raised an uproar against it was this deal blocked. Only for this reason it didn’t take place. But you have to realize how clever the KGB is. This technology didn’t have to stay two or three weeks in a Soviet building under Soviet guard. Two or three nights were enough for the KGB there to look through it and to copy it. And if today, persons are being hunted down by the best and most advanced technology, for this, I can also thank your western capitalists. This is something which is almost incomprehensible to the human mind: That burning greed for profit, which goes beyond all reason, all self-control, all conscience, only to get money.
I must say that Lenin foretold this whole process. Lenin, who spent most of his life living in the West and not in Russia, who knew the West much better than Russia, always wrote and said the western capitalists would do anything to strengthen the economy of the USSR. They will compete with each other to sell us goods cheaper and sell them quicker, so that the Soviets will buy from one rather than from the other. He said: They will bring it themselves without thinking about their future. And, in a difficult moment, at a party meeting in Moscow, he said: ‘Comrades, don’t panic, when things go very hard for us, we will give a rope to the bourgeoisie, and the bourgeoisie will hang itself.’
Then, Karl Radek, whom you may have heard of, who was a very resourceful wit, said: ‘Vladimir Ilyich, but where are we going to get enough rope to hang the whole bourgeoisie?’
Lenin effortlessly replied, ‘They’ll supply us with it.’
Through the decades of the 20s, the 30s, the 40s, the 50s, the whole Soviet press wrote: Western capitalism — your end is near. But it was as if the capitalists had not heard, could not understand, could not believe this.
Nikita Khrushchev came here and said, ‘We will bury you!’ They didn’t believe that, either. They took it as a joke.” 
* * *
Why did the CFR-Globalists suppress Alexandr Solzhenitsyn’s message? Because they don’t want the American people to know:
1. There is a covert alliance between the men who control the communist world and the Globalists who control our nation.
2. The U.S. has kept ruthless communist regimes in power.
The strange alliance between communism and capitalism existed long before the Russian Revolution. It initially surfaced during the French Revolution when members of the French aristocracy tried to help the Jacobins establish a communal society, and reappeared thirty years later (1820) when Robert Owen, the son of wealthy English capitalists, established a commune in New Harmony, Indiana.  When Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto in 1847, his closest friend and benefactor was Frederick Engels, the son of a wealthy capitalist, and in 1902, the leaders of the British Fabian Society (an appendage of the communist movement) began holding weekly meetings with a group of wealthy capitalists to determine, “What are we doing with the world?”  Lord Alfred Milner attended the meetings, financed the initial stage of the Russian Revolution (March 1917), helped Lenin establish his regime, and sent Bruce Lockhart to Saint Petersburg to monitor the course of the Communist Revolution.  William Boyce Thompson (a member of the Board of Directors of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank) sent Raymond Robins to Russia for the same purpose, so Bruce Lockhart and Raymond Robins worked together. Edward Griffin’s book, The Creature From Jekyll Island, describes what happened:
“The Bolsheviks were well aware of the power these men represented, and there was no door closed to them. They were allowed to attend meetings of the Central Executive Committee, and were consulted regarding important decisions.” 
Bruce Lockhart’s book, British Agent, described an important event:
“Another new acquaintance of these first days in Bolshevised St. Petersburg was Raymond Robins, the head of the American Red Cross Mission. . . . Although a rich man himself, he was an anti-capitalist. . . . Hitherto, his two heroes had been Roosevelt and Cecil Rhodes. Now Lenin had captured his imagination. . . . Robins was the only man whom Lenin was always willing to see, and who ever succeeded in imposing his own personality on the unemotional Bolshevik leader. . . . I returned from my interview to our flat only to find an urgent message from Robins requesting me to come to see him at once. I found him in a state of great agitation. He had been in conflict with Saalkind, a nephew of Trotsky, and then Assistant Commissar for Foreign Affairs. Saalkind had been rude, and the American, who had a promise from Lenin that, whatever happened, a train would always be ready for him at an hour’s notice, was determined to exact an apology or to leave the country. When I arrived he had just finished telephoning to Lenin. He had delivered his ultimatum, and Lenin had promised to give a reply within ten minutes. I waited, while Robins fumed. Then the telephone rang and Robins picked up the receiver. Lenin had capitulated. Saalkind was dismissed from his post. He was an old member of the Party. Would Robins have any objection if Lenin sent him as a Bolshevik emissary to Berne? Robins smiled grimly. ‘Thank you, Mr. Lenin,’ he said. ‘As I can’t send the (expletive deleted) to hell, ‘burn’ is the next best thing you can do with him.'” 
Professor Antony Sutton documented the fact that the U.S. financed the Soviet Union between 1918 and 1939, during World War II, during the post-war period, during the Korean War, and during the Vietnam War era. 
Some members of Congress recognized what was happening, and tried to warn the America people. Congressman John Ashbrook stated (March 6, 1974):
“. . . U.S. technical trade with the Soviet Union and other East European countries has ‘gained significant momentum’ since the May, 1972 Moscow summit conference and will undoubtedly continue to increase at a gradual rate. The American share of Soviet imports of plants and equipment from the West is now running about 20 percent of the total. It is ironic that while American businessmen are trading hundreds of millions of dollars for plants and equipment to the Soviet Union, the Administration is asking for an increased defense budget to meet the Soviet military threat – a threat which, in part, is being built with American technology.” 
Congressman Steve Symms was concerned about U.S. aid to the Soviet Union, and wrote a March 1974 article that stated:
“Few Americans fully appreciate the extent to which their tax dollars are being used to finance their own destruction. The dealings of the Export-Import Bank are a good example. U.S. ‘loans’ to the Soviet Union through the bank now total over 760 million dollars to finance projects like constructing the world’s largest truck plant on the Kama River. Only two weeks ago an additional $67.5 million of your money was provided for this project, along with a 20 million dollar loan for a Russian acetic acid plant.
Another $180 million is now being earmarked for a chemical complex in the USSR and $49.5 million for a gas exploration project in Eastern Siberia. . . .
U.S. tax dollars are not only propping up a ruthless dictatorship but they are helping to arm our enemy to the teeth. While America is . . . building factories and other valuable strategic facilities on Russian soil, the Kremlin is diverting proportionally more of its own resources toward sophisticated offensive weaponry. It makes one wonder whose side the Export-Import Bank officials are really on. Modern-day liberals often refer to these kinds of suicidal give-aways as ‘meaningful cooperation in the spirit of detente.’ It use to be called treason.” 
When U.S. Senator William Armstrong addressed the Senate in 1982, he stated:
“America’s budgetary woes would not be nearly so severe if our economy were not groan- ing under the strain of financing two military budgets: Our own, and a significant portion of the Soviet Union’s. . . . This great irony for Americans who will be asked to tighten their belts in order to pay for our defense needs is that much of the additional money that must be spent on defense is required to offset Soviet weapons that probably could not have been built without our assistance. . . . It is difficult to overstate the extent to which the West had contributed to the military threat that now endangers our very existence.” 
The following year (1983), John Lehman, the Secretary of the Navy, told the graduating class of midshipmen at Annapolis:
“Within weeks, many of you will be looking across just hundreds of feet of water at some of the most modern technology ever invented in America. Unfortunately, it is on Soviet ships.” 
Four years later (1987) the Multinational Monitor published an article by Samantha Sparks that stated:
“While much of the world remains focused on the Third World’s debt crisis, slack export earnings and a tightening of commercial credit flows have created major foreign debt problems for the Eastern European region. Total debt owed by the region, including the Soviet Union, stood at about $138 billion at the end of 1986.” 
How did Russia become the largest oil and natural gas producer in the world? The CFR-Globalists blocked efforts to develop the massive oil and natural gas resources in the U.S., and financed oil and natural gas exploration in the Soviet Union. Congressman Richard H. Ichord wrote (1974):
“We are especially alarmed by the report that the Bank (Export-Import Bank) is on the verge of granting $49 million in credit to the Soviet Union for exploration of Eastern Siberian gas fields. We believe that American financing of Soviet gas exploration at this particular time in history, especially at an interest rate of 6% (which is in effect to be subsidised by the American taxpayer), smacks not only of poor business judgment, but suggests a disregard for our national security. Every nation’s defense capacity is directly related to its energy resources. The real question is why do we spend some $80 billion a year to maintain such a large military establishment. . . . This has enabled the Soviet Union to engage in the largest peacetime military buildup in the history of man. We can- not afford to adopt any trade or credit policies that will allow the Soviets to further expand their military machine.” 
The Chase Manhattan Bank financed the Russian pipeline that is sending natural gas to Europe, and Western banks, corporations, and the U.S. Export-Import Bank developed Russia’s oil and natural gas reserves. On June 22, 2004, Jeffrey L. Miller, the Senior Vice President of the U.S. Export-Import Bank, stated:
“. . . (the) Ex-Im Bank has been active in developing Russia’s oil and gas industry. Almost 50 percent of our portfolio in Russia is in this area. We have helped support moderniz- ation efforts of more than a dozen oil companies with medium- and long-term financing and we are looking at several pipeline projects what would help bring Russian oil and gas to market. . . . Sakhalin II can . . . transform Russia, as Ras Laffan and Quantas Natural Gas transformed Qatar. Sponsored by Shell, Mitsubishi, and Mitsui, Sakhalin II involves the development of the first liquified natural gas facility in the Russian Federation.” 
Why did the CFR-Globalists finance communism during the twentieth century? Why are they financing communism today? Some people believe they are foolish, others believe they are motivated by greed, but I don’t accept either explanation. I will discuss the origin of the “communist-capitalist alliance” next month.
The tempo of violence is increasing throughout the world, occult belief is spreading, and some Christian leaders claim we must “experience God.” What does the future hold? I don’t know the answer to that question, but I believe the world is going to change in the coming months, and we must continue our effort to expose the spiritual battle that is taking place throughout the world today. Please continue circulating my Radio Liberty letters, encourage your friends to access www.robodon.com/new_page_1.htm where they can watch many of our videos without charge, and remember:
1: Make a joyful noise unto the Lord, all ye lands.
2: Serve the Lord with gladness: come before his presence with singing.
3: Know ye that the Lord he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.
4: Enter into his gates with thanksgiving, and into his courts with praise: be thankful unto him, and bless his name.
5: For the Lord is good; his mercy is everlasting; and his truth endureth to all generations. 
That is our hope; that is our promise. Barbara and I appreciate your faithful support, and your prayers.
Yours in Christ,
*** Please note: In the March letter, it stated on page 7 that Cong. Ashcroft died in 1982. That should have read Cong. Ashbrook. We apologise for the error. April 2007, Page 8
1. Congressional Record, Proceedings of the 94th Congress, Volume 121, Part 17, July 8 -14, 1975, pp. 21453.
3. Samantha Sparks, http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1987/11/sparks.html
4. Jeffrey Miller, www.exim.gov/news/speeches/jul2204.cfm 5. Antony Sutton, http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/best_enemy/appendix_b.htm
6. McGeorge Bundy, “The End of Either/Or,” Foreign Affairs, Volume 45, No 2, January, 1967, pp. 189-201.
7. Isambard Wilkinson in Wana, “Pakistan behind pro-Taliban Tribesmen,” Telegraph.co.uk, April 13, 2007.
8. Rebuilding America’s Defenses: www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm, p. 14.
9. Curt Tarnoff, “U.S. Assistance to the Former Soviet Union,” CRS Report for Congress: March 1, 2007, Congressional Research Service. Copy can be purchased from Radio Liberty.
10. Ibid. 11. Congressional Record, Proceedings of the 94th Congress, op. cit., pp. 21452-21458.
12. James Billington, Fire in The Minds of Men, Basic Books, New York, 1980, p. 489.
13. H.G. Wells, Experiment in Autobiography, The Macmillan Company, 1934, pp. 651-64. Also, Fire in the Minds of Men, Ibid., p. 189.
14, Stanley Monteith, Brotherhood of Darkness, Hearthstone Publishing, 2000, p. 67.
15. G. Edward Griffin, The Creature From Jekyll Island, American Media, 1994, p. 282.
16. R.H. Bruce Lockhart, British Agent, G. Putnam’s Sons, New York and London, 1933, pp. 225-26.
17. Antony Sutton, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, Liberty House Press, Billings, Montana, 1986.
See Also: Radio Liberty video: The Best Enemies Money Can Buy, available from Radio Liberty.
18. Dr. Harold Pease, The Communist-Capitalist Alliance, Internet publication, p. 3. Quoted from Congressional Record, March 6, 1974. http://autarchic.tripod.com/files/alliance.html
19. Ibid., p. 4.
20. G. Edward Griffin, op. cit., p. 304.
21. Ibid., p. 303.
22. Samantha Sparks, op. cit.
23. Dr. Harold Pease, op. cit., p. 4.
24. Jeffrey Miller, op. cit., p.2.
25. Psalm 100, Holy Bible, King James Version.
Dear Friend of Radio Liberty,
“Reality is usually scoffed at, illusion is usually king, but in the battle for the survival of Western civilization, it will be reality, not illusion or delusion, that will determine what the future will bring.”
A favorite phrase of Congressman Larry MacDonald whose plane (KAL007) was “shot down” on September 1, 1983 
“If you travel an hour from the two major cities (in Russia) you will find yourself in the 19th century.”
Yuri Felshtinsky, Radio Liberty interview, April 23, 2007 
“Financial aid from the West is definitely not in short supply here. Never in the history of multilateral funding has so much money been pumped into one country within such a short period of time.”
Ellen Schmidt, “The World Bank and Russian Oil,” 1996 
“Sixty-five years ago, the United States Export-Import Bank was created for the sole purpose of expanding trade with Russia. . . . Ex-Im Bank has concluded that now is the appropriate time to cautiously expand our work in Russia by creating a partnership with 15 banks in this country to provide financing for Russia to buy what it needs from the U.S. in order to build its infrastructure, its economy and its future.”
James A. Harmon, Chairman: U.S. Export-Import Bank, Moscow, December 5, 2000. 
“Ex-Im Bank has been active in developing Russia’s oil and gas industry. Almost 50 percent of our portfolio in Russia is in this area. . . . We have helped support modernization efforts of more than a dozen oil companies with medium- and long-term financing, and we are looking at several pipeline projects that would help bring Russian oil and gas to market. “
Jeffrey L Miller, Senior Vice President and Head of Export Finance, Export-Import Bank of the United States, July 22, 2004 
“Russia tested new missiles Tuesday that a Kremlin official boasted could penetrate any defense system, and President Vladimir Putin warned that U.S. plans for an anti-missile shield in Europe would turn the region into a ‘powder keg.'”
USA Today, May 29, 2007 
“But the main thing was not what we had seen there but what we had not seen – the divers had found practically no human bodies or remains.”
A diver who explored the wreckage of Korean Flight 007 
My April 2007 letter concluded with this statement:
“Why did the CFR-Globalists finance communism during the twentieth century? Why are they financing communism today? Some people believe they are foolish, others believe they are motivated by greed, but I don’t accept either explanation. I will discuss the origin of the “communist-capitalist alliance next month.”
If you listen to Radio Liberty regularly, you know that I begin most of my broadcasts with the following satement:
“Reality is usually scoffed at, illusion is usually king, but in the battle for the survival of Western civilization, it will be reality, not illusion or delusion, that will determine what the future will bring.”
The phrase originated with Congressman Larry MacDonald who was a passenger on Korean Fight 007 that was attacked by a Soviet fighter jet on September 1, 1983.  Have you ever wondered why a Soviet official ordered an attack on a civilian airliner? I believe the plane was “shot down” because Congressman MacDonald was exposing the alliance between communism and capitalism, and people were beginning to believe him. Speeches by Professor Antony Sutton and Alexandr Solzhenitsyn confirmed Larry MacDonald’s position, but the Establishment-controlled media suppressed his information, and as a result, most people don’t realize there is a “communist-capitalist alliance.”
What happened to the passengers and the wreckage of Korean Flight 007? I will tell you part of that amazing story at the conclusion of this letter.
During the month of May I interviewed Yuri Felshtinsky who wrote Blowing Up Russia. The man who co-authored the book, Alexander Litvinenko, was poisoned by the FSB (KGB) because he revealed Vladimir Putin, the former Chief of the FSB (KGB), had the FSB blow up three apartment buildings in Moscow and kill 300 people to justify the Russian attack on Chechnya.  One of the puzzling things that Yuri Felshtinsky told me was:
“If you travel an hour from the two major cities (in Russia) you will find yourself in the 19th century.” 
That statement troubled me. If the USSR was really a superpower before the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, what happened to the infrastructure of the nation? I suspect almost everything the American people knew about Russia before “the fall of communism,” and almost everything they believe about Russia today has been staged by the “communist-capitalist alliance.” The Establishment-controlled media claims Russia is the largest exporter of oil and natural gas in the world, and that is probably true, but the infrastructure of Russia is primitive because communism destroys human incentive. How did Russia become the world’s largest exporter of oil and natural gas? The occult force that controls the U.S. and Europe financed the drilling programs that have enriched Russia and impoverished the United States.
In June 1996, The World Economy, Ecology and Development Association published an article by Ellen Schmidt titled, “The World Bank and Russian Oil.” The report stated:
“Never in the history of multilateral funding has so much money been pumped into one country within such a short period of time. Working in close conjunction with the IMF, the World Bank is in charge of developing structural and sector programs for transforming Russia into a capitalist market economy. It also coordinates overall aid. From the World Bank’s point of view, the oil and gas sector plays a key role in Russia’s overall transformation process. The World Bank, together with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), presses Russia to increase its crude oil production with billions of dollars.” 
“The cornucopia of the various international finance institutions (IFIs) are virtually overflowing in their bounty: Nearly US$ 9.3 billion flowed into Russian coffers in 1995 to finance a multitude of projects and to get Russia’s national budget out of the red and into the black (an increase of nearly US$ 3.3 billion over the previous year). This sum has been augmented by bilateral advisory and project assistance from the G-7 nations (some US$ 370 million from 1993 to 1995) and funding provided by the European Union’s Technical Assistance for the Commonwealth of Independent States (TACIS) program which brought approximately US$ 208 million into Russia in 1995. . . . In the spring of 1996, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) pledged once again to allocate US$ 10 billion for Russia (SZ, 26 Feb. 1996). The private West-East capital transfer is several times larger than this. In 1994, credit guarantees issued by the German government for private export transactions with Russia totaled some DM 2.84 billion (approximately US$ 1.9 billion). As a result, Russia ranked second only to the People’s Republic of China as Germany’s leading partner in government-assisted export trade.” 
AMOCO developed several major oil fields in Siberia during that era. The company was subsequently purchased by British Petroleum and three Russian billionaires who are currently involved in a $20 billion natural gas project in Siberia. Why is that significant? Because most of Russia’s 60 billionaires (Oligarchs) are ex-KGB agents. In addition, Exxon is currently involved in a $20 billion natural gas project on Sakhalin Island (Sakhalin-1), and Royal Dutch Shell is currently involved in a $20 billion natural gas project called Sakhalin-2. 
The Occult Hierarchy (the communist-capitalist alliance) organized the U.S. Ex-Im Bank in 1934 to keep the brutal Soviet regime in power, and financed the industrial growth of the USSR until the Berlin Wall fell in 1989. They resumed funding Russia in 1993, and lent billions of dollars to Russia through various international agencies.  The following information was extracted from an address that was delivered in Moscow by James A. Harmon (CFR), Chairman of the U.S. Export-Import Bank, on December 5, 2000 – 15 months after the FSB (KGB) bombed the apartment buildings in Moscow, and 11 months after Colonel Vladimir Putin seized power. Mr. Harmon’s remarks are printed in bold type; my comments are written in italics.
“Thank you all for coming. Sixty-five years ago, the United States Export-Import Bank was created for the sole purpose of expanding trade with Russia.
The Roosevelt Administration established the U.S. Export-Import Bank in 1934 to fund the USSR. The conflict between communism and capitalism is a ruse.
While today Ex-Im Bank works with countries around the world, I am here to announce a new effort that serves the original purpose of this Bank. After reviewing all that is happening in Russia today – from the new leadership to political reforms to the banking sector – Ex-Im Bank has concluded that now is the appropriate time to cautiously expand our work in Russia by creating a partnership with 15 banks in this country to provide financing for Russia to buy what it needs from the U.S. in order to build its infrastructure, its economy and its future.
Officials of the U.S. Export-Import Bank decided to resume funding of Russia because the Chief of the FSB (KGB), Colonel Vladimir Putin, had seized power, and they were certain he would suppress political dissent.
This new partnership builds on a positive history between Ex-Im Bank and Russia. In the past five years, one-third of all U.S. capital goods sold to this country were financed by Ex-Im Bank – from medical equipment for the Moscow children’s hospital to oil and gas equipment to help build up a key sector of the Russian economy.
The U.S. Export-Import Bank withheld funding during the 1990s because they wanted the communists to regain power. When Colonel Putin took power, the Ex-Im Bank, the World Bank, the IMF, and U.S. banks and corporations provided the funds that have made Russia the largest exporter of oil and natural gas in the world.
A number of circumstances make expanding our partnership a possibility today. First and foremost, Ex-Im Bank has had a positive experience in Russia. We were among the first financial institutions back in 1993. We were among the first back again after the 1998 crisis. Yet a full 99% of our Russia portfolio has been paid. This is better than the Bank’s record worldwide.
Russia repaid its loans to the Ex-Im Bank because the World Bank, the IMF, and other U.S. and European financial institutions provided the funds. Several years later the U.S. encouraged the Oil Cartel to increase the price of oil so Russia could pay off its loans to Western banks, and amass almost $400 billion in gold and foreign currencies.
Russia is currently providing sophisticated military equipment to Iran and Syria that will be used against the U.S. during the coming conflict in the Middle East.
We also are encouraged by a combination of factors that indicate that Russia will move further down the path of positive reforms. These factors include Russia’s economic recovery; . . . .
The Russian economy recovered because the U.S. developed Russia’s oil and natural gas resources.
a leadership that is reform-minded on economic policy – as evidenced by the Gref Plan; and, a leader – President Putin – who has demonstrated his ability to work with the Duma to enact major reforms. This is a skill that we in the United States can appreciate.
Vladimir Putin joined the KGB in 1975, and was chief of the FSB (the former KGB) until he became President of Russia on December 31, 1999. Putin has consolidated power, suspended democratic election of State Governors, and murdered journalists and politicians who oppose him, yet James Harmon (CFR) , the President of the Ex-Im Bank, claims Vladimir Putin has demonstrated “a skill that we in the United States can appreciate.”
These developments offer the government of Russia its best opportunity in many years to enact the reforms necessary to attract more foreign capital and build a strong economic future.
Yuri Andropov, the Chief of the KGB, took control of Russia in 1964, and subsequently every President of the USSR (with the exception of Yeltsin) came from the KGB. James Harmon seemed pleased that Colonel Putin, the former Chief of the FSB (KGB), controlled Russia.
Having just completed a series of meetings with government leaders here, I am hopeful that the country will proceed with reforms to the banking system and to the private-sector environment – reforms that can help sustain the strong economic growth we see here in Russia today.
The Ex-Im Bank wanted to expand the Russian banking system because banking policy controls the economy, and the Ex-Im Bank was going to control most of the major banks in Russia.
For 50 years, Ex-Im Bank has helped foster economic growth around the world through our work with foreign banks. These banks provide a mechanism for us to reach the private sector in other countries and offer financing for the purchase of U.S. goods and services. I am pleased to expand this partnership to include banks here in Russia. . . .
Today, Ex-Im Bank has about $2.3 billion in loans and guarantees outstanding in Russia. We expect that this will grow in the next few years. . . . Russia will embark on a significant modernization effort to upgrade key sectors of its economy and improve and expand vital social services. . . . This is precisely the climate in which Ex-Im Bank is designed to work to the benefit of both our nations. We step in and provide credit for Russia to purchase whatever it needs from the United States.” 
Three-and-a-half years later, on July 22, 2004, Jeffrey L. Miller, the Senior Vice President and Head of Export Finance of the Export-Import Bank, delivered an address titled, “Russia In Asia – Asia In Russia: Energy, Economics and Regional Relations.” I have reproduced his remarks in bold print, my remarks are reproduced in italics.
“I want to talk to you about a recurring theme in today’s speeches and panels: that trade will play a key role in integrating Russia fully into the world of stable, free-market economies. And of course, energy is a huge component of this potential trade.
The goal of the Ex-Im Bank is to support the tyrannical regimes in Russia and China, and in other nations throughout the world. Almost all the current leaders of Russia, and the Oligarchs (Russian billionaires) who support them, are former members of the KGB.
The West, particularly the United States, wants to diversify energy sources from the Middle East to other, more stable regions, and Northeast Asia already is a critical component in this diversification. But huge investments will be needed to further expand and modernize Russia’s energy sector. Private financing alone cannot do it, nor can public funds.
The U.S. has vast oil and natural gas deposits, but the Occult Hierarchy has blocked efforts to develop them because they want to strengthen the tyrannical regime that controls Russia, and impoverish the American people.
It will take a cooperative effort by export credit agencies, such as Ex-Im Bank; international financial institutions, including global regional development banks; and private lenders. We must all work together to make this happen, for the benefit of Russia and all of its main trading partners.
As I mentioned, enormous investments will be required to help Russian companies access the goods and services they need to grow. The potential for trading partners to supply technology, capital equipment, services, and investment is great.
It appears that Russia may be on the right track. Cumulative foreign investment in Russia increased by 50 percent in 2003 from the previous year. Foreign direct investment was up 69 percent, while the investment category consisting mostly of loans rose 47 percent Russia’s trade surplus last year was $60 billion – up from $46 billion the year before.
The Occult Hierarchy is transferring America’s wealth to Russia and China. The U.S. trade deficit was $489 billion in 2003, $725 billion in 2005, and $856 billion in 2006 , while Russia’s trade surplus was $164 billion in 2006, and Russia currently has $400 billion in gold and foreign reserves. How much does the U.S. hold in foreign reserves? The U.S. is currently borrowing between $2 and $3 billion a day to pay expenses.
Russian exports to the United States grew during 2003 to $8.6 billion, while U.S. exports to Russia increased 2.2 percent to $2.45 billion. Russia’s exports to Asia increased from $11 billion in 1999 to $19 billion in 2002. . . .
Proponents of the U.S. Export-Import Bank claim the U.S. loans money to Russia so they can buy American products, but that isn’t true. Russia exported products worth $8.6 billion to the U.S. in 2003, and imported products worth $2.45 billion from the U.S. that year.
Ex-Im Bank has been active in developing Russia’s oil and gas industry. Almost 50 percent of our portfolio in Russia is in this area. We have helped support modernization efforts of more than a dozen oil companies with medium- and long-term financing, and we are looking at several pipeline projects that would help bring Russian oil and gas to market.” 
The World Bank, the IMF, the Asian Development Bank, the Export-Import Bank, the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, U.S. AIDS program, U.S. Treasury, and U.S. and European banks and corporations have transferred hundreds of billions of dollars to the totalitarian regimes that rule Russia and China, and continue financing those regimes today.
USA Today recently reported:
“Russia tested new missiles Tuesday that a Kremlin official boasted could penetrate any defense system, and President Vladimir Putin warned that U.S. plans for an anti-missile shield in Europe would turn the region into a ‘powder keg.'” 
The article is designed to convince the American people that Russia has become our enemy; that is part of the ongoing deception.
I began this letter with the question:
“Why did the CFR-Globalists finance communism during the twentieth century? Why are they financing communism today? Some people believe they are foolish, others believe they are motivated by greed, but I don’t accept either explanation.”
I believe the Occult Hierarchy founded communism and capitalism, and has used them to pursue their goal – a world government, a universal religion, and a world leader. 
The second issue I raised was the fate of Congressman Larry MacDonald. I believe the Occult Hierarchy was responsible for the attack on KAL007, and that it was carried out to silence Congressman MacDonald. What happened to the wreckage of the plane and the passengers? Bert Schlossberg’s father-in-law was a passenger on the plane, so Bert set out to determine what happened. Radio Liberty carries his book, Rescue 007, and the long-suppressed Senate Foreign Relations Committee Report on the accident. What happened? A team of Russian scuba divers discovered the wreckage of KAL007 and explored the site. What did they find? V. Zakharchenko described the scene:
“But the main thing was not what we had seen there but what we had not seen – the divers had found practically no human bodies or remains. . . .” 
Several reliable sources claim most of the passengers survived the crash landing and were taken to prisons in the Soviet Gulag. If that is true, KAL007 was forced to land to prevent the American people from learning about the “communist-capitalist alliance.” 
Please copy and distribute my March, April, and May 2007 letters. They can be purchased in booklet form for $1.95 each plus shipping, or 50 copies for $49.95 plus shipping.
What lies ahead? If the U.S. attacks Iran, we may face a conflict with the Muslim world, and a nuclear war. Please reread page 6 of my February 2007 letter, and note the message that Djwal Kuhl channeled to Alice Bailey. What can we do? We must continue our effort to awaken the American people, prepare physically, financially, and spiritually for the difficult times that lie ahead, and remember that:
Men ask a sign: there is no sign, To prove the truth thereof;
Even angels drop no plummet line, To sound the deeps of love.
If He Who made the rolling world, Like dewdrops, with His sleeve,
Swept half the bright stars, sky – empearled, – Men still would disbelieve.
Who asks no sign, but gives his heart, In humble faith, shall find
What all things else fail to impart, To heart, or hope, or mind.
As meteors, trailing down the night, Each fading to a spark,
Are kindled from unceasing Light, That waits behind the dark.
Your transient doubts will shine and fade, Embarking into naught,
And back of them loom, mightier made, The truth which Jesus taught.
In the midst of all the trials we talk about, our hope is in Him.
Barbara and I appreciate your continued support and prayers.
Yours in Christ,
1. Statement attributed to Congressman Larry MacDonald.
2. Yuri Felshtinsky, Radio Liberty Interview, April 23, 2007, 8:00 p.m.
3. Ellen Schmidt: “The World Bank and Russian Oil,” World Economy, Ecology, and Development Association, June 1996, Berliner Platz 1, 53111, Bonn, Germany, p. 5.
4. James Harmon, www.exim.gov/cftools/print.cfm/B0C94FEC-1032-5B0F-B9A542B9C489EE6E/
5. Jeffrey Miller, www.exim.gov/news/speeches/jul2204.cfm
8. Ibid. 9. Alexander Litvinenko, Blowing Up Russia, Gibson Square Books, 2007.
10. Yuri Felshtinsky, op. cit.
11. Ellen Schmidt, op. cit.
13. “BP May Lose Project to Russia Power Grab,” The Wall Street Journal, June 1, 2007, p A9.
See Also: http://articcircle.uconn.edu/SEEJ/Yamal/russianoil.html , p.2
14. “The Former Soviet Union and U.S. Foreign Assistance, Updated September 16, 2003, The Congressional Research Service:
See Also, “USAID/RUSSIA, Strategy Statement, USAID, November 15, 2005.
15. James Harmon, op. cit.
16. Jeffrey Miller, op. cit.
17. http://usatoday.printthis, op. cit.
18. February 2007 Radio Liberty letter, p. 6.
19. www.airliners.net, op. cit.
Dear Friend of Radio Liberty,
“One remarkable accomplishment of leaders in both the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations is their perfection of the technique of manipulating news and language in such a way as to make black look white – leading the people to believe something that is obviously not so.” 
“Our aid to the communist-led rebels during the seven-year war amounted to approximately 73 million dollars; but our psychological and fraternal aid to them was enormous. In the UN and in international meetings, United States officials worked hand-in-glove with Soviet officials to fan the fires of hatred, throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America, against European colonial powers.” 
“Could it be that two weeks ago (that is, when the State Department stopped the aid- to-Algeria talks) the State Department wasn’t sure that Ben Bella was in the enemy camp and didn’t want to waste U.S. aid on a nation which might turn out to be friendly? When the chips were down, Algeria was against us. This proof of defiance apparently was sufficient to restore the State Department’s faith in Ben Bella and to qualify Algeria for future U.S. aid.” 
Most people find it difficult to believe there is a secret alliance between the wicked men who lead the communist world and the powerful men who control our nation, but the alliance has existed since the inception of communism, and has been carefully concealed. If you doubt the validity of that statement, I suggest you read my book, Professor Sutton’s books, Professor Quigley’s book, and Rene Wormser’s book, and the March, April, and May 2007 Radio Liberty letters. 
Other researchers have tried to expose “the communist-capitalist alliance,” but they invariably failed because the powerful men who control our nation also control the majority of the American media and suppress the information.
This Radio Liberty letter is based on a segment of the November 12, 1962, Dan Smoot Report titled, “It Helps to be a Communist.” Dan Smoot’s words are reproduced in bold print; my response is italicized.
“One remarkable accomplishment of leaders in both the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations is their perfection of the technique of manipulating news and language in such a way as to make black look white – leading the people to believe something that is obviously not so.”
The situation is far worse today. Approximately fifty (50) corporations controlled the media in 1962, five (5) mega corporations control 90-95% of the American media today. 
I first became aware of the censorship that existed in the U.S. in 1962 when I read a San Francisco Chronicle article that stated:
“Premier Ben Bella marched into Algiers today at the head of his troops to the cheers of the throngs.”
At that time I wondered who Ben Bella was. Was he a communist or an anti-communist? Later that day I read the text of the same article in another newspaper, but this time the article stated:
“Premier Ben Bella marched into Algiers today at the head of his communist equipped troops to the cheers of the throngs.” (underline added – ed)
The remainder of the article was identical. I was shocked. Someone had intentionally deleted the words “communist equipped” from the first article to conceal the fact that Ahmed Ben Bella was aligned with the communists. It was literally this event that changed the course of my life.
“Every year, during the legislative battle over foreign aid, our President bluntly says . . . that our aid to underdeveloped countries is necessary to save them from communism. The argument is that underdeveloped countries are so poor and weak that if we do not give them aid, they will turn to communism. Once they become communist, they will, somehow, grow strong enough to destroy us. Thus, we are saving ourselves from destruction by giving aid to underdeveloped nations.”
The U.S. routinely finances pro-communist governments and undermines anti-communist governments. The U.S. cut off military supplies to the King of Nepal in 2006 and helped install a Maoist regime in that country. 
“This remarkable argument has been used so much that many people still seem to believe it, although the record clearly shows that our foreign aid is financing the communist conquest of underdeveloped areas. Examine a few striking case histories.
THE CASE OF ALGERIA
In 1954, Ben Bella organized in Algeria the FLN (Front of National Liberation), a communist terrorist organization, to fight for Algerian independence from France and then to establish Algeria as a communist nation.
On November 1, 1954, Ben Bella ordered the FLN to massacre a large number of Moslems. This initiated a long and ghastly war. Ben Bella’s communists would massacre Moslems and place the blame either on the French army or on European civilians – thus inflaming hatreds which would result in Moslem attacks on Europeans, and action by the French.”
The U.S. media seldom mentions massive communist massacres, but condemns and bemoans acts of violence by anti-communist governments.
“The United States supported both sides of this bloody war. Our aid to France was massive, and was intended to enable her to keep her commitments as our major ally in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. France used our aid, however, to fight the war in Algeria.
Our aid to the communist-led rebels during the seven-year war amounted to approximately 73 million dollars; but our psychological and fraternal aid to them was enormous. In the UN and in inter- national meetings, United States officials worked hand-in-glove with Soviet officials to fan the fires of hatred, throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America, against European colonial powers. Hence, the French, while using our aid to fight in Algeria, hated us for our stand against them on the ‘Algerian problem.’ Ben Bella’s communist terrorists, on the other hand, created widespread hatred of us among Algerians, because the French were using United States equipment and money to fight Algerians.”
Ninety-seven percent of the foreign aid sent to Russia following World War I was sent to the communists , U.S. banks and U.S. corporations financed the Nazis before and during World War II , U.S. officials sent the plates for the U.S. occupation currency to the Soviets following World War II , the U.S. financed the Soviet Union that provided weapons to the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War , the U.S. is financing the Pakistani government that is financing the ISI that is financing the Taliban force that is killing U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan today , and the U.S. is supplying weapons to some of the Suni forces that are fighting against American soldiers in Iraq. 
“On October 22, 1956, the French arrested Ben Bella – and kept him in prison for five and a half years. While he was in prison, his work was carried on by the FLN, under the direction of Ben Khedda and others.
On July 2, 1957, John F. Kennedy (then a Senator) introduced in the Senate a resolution calling for the United States to support the independence movement in Algeria.
On September 19, 1958, FLN leaders, at Cairo, formed a Provisional Government of the Algerian Republic. Ben Bella, though still in prison, was named Vice Premier, the Number Two place in the government.
On October 7, 1960, Khrushchev extended diplomatic recognition to the Provisional Government.
On August 27, 1961, Ben Khedda (a known, ‘tough,’ revolutionary, who had been directing FLN operations) was ‘elected’ the new premier of the Provisional Government. Ben Bella, still in prison, kept his Number Two place.
On March 18, 1962, a truce between France and the Algerian insurrectionists was signed.
Ben Bella was released from prison shortly after the truce was signed.
On March 19, 1962, the New York Herald Tribune reported that 76 veterans of the Algerian FLN had arrived in Cuba to train Cuban terrorists and insurrectionists.
On July 1, 1962, France recognized the independence of Algeria.
On July 3, 1962, President Kennedy recognized the independence of Algeria but withheld full diplomatic relations, pending the formation of a permanent government which could demonstrate its effective control over the country.
Using communist tactics, in which he was most proficient, Ben Bella eliminated all opposition and rigged a Soviet-style election giving the voters a chance to vote only for Ben Bella candidates.
On September 26, 1962, Ben Bella became Premier, pledging in his first speech to create prosperity and stability in the ‘Algerian Socialist Republic.’ In name as in aim, Ben Bella patterned his program after the communist program in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
On September 29, 1962, President Kennedy extended full recognition to Ben Bella’s ‘socialist’ government.
On October 7, 1962, Ben Bella arrived in New York for the occasion of Algeria’s admission to the UN. His first official act was a visit at the Dryden Hotel with Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado, President of Cuba. The New York Times of October 8 carried a front page picture of Ben Bella and Dorticos in warm and smiling embrace.
That same morning – October 8 – Dorticos spoke to the UN General Assembly, denouncing the United States in extreme and bitter terms. Ben Bella was in the audience listening. That afternoon – October 8 – Ben Bella’s Algeria was admitted as the 109th member of the United Nations. Adlai Stevenson (U.S. delegate to the UN) spoke to the General Assembly, welcoming the new member, waxing eloquent about the ‘cutting of the chains’ which had ‘held the people of Algeria’ – and pledging United States tax money to help Algeria ‘in coping with her economic and technical difficulties.’
On October 9, 1962, Ben Bella addressed the UN General Assembly. He proclaimed the ‘neutrality’ of Algeria – and demanded that communist China be admitted to the UN. He also announced support for the subversive ‘nationalist’ movements (mostly communist dominated) throughout Africa – in Angola, Rhodesia, South Africa, and Southwest Africa.
On October 12, 1962, Mohammed Khemisti, Ben Bella’s Foreign Minister, spoke to the UN General Assembly. Mr. Khemisti also proclaimed Algeria’s ‘neutrality,’ while supporting the communist ‘nationalist’ movements in Africa. Mr. Khemisti, saying Ben Bella’s government ‘rejects capitalism as inappropriate,’ reaffirmed that Algeria will take the ‘socialist road.’ Khemisti praised Castro and denounced ‘efforts to attack and undermine the political regime chosen by the friendly people of Cuba’ as a threat to international peace.
Khemisti also supported the Soviet position with regard to the Berlin issue, using, indeed, the same phrase that Khrushchev uses in discussing settlement of the German problem. Khemisti said the Berlin crisis must be settled on a basis that ‘recognizes the realities of the German situation.’
Three days later – October 15 – President Kennedy gave Ben Bella one of the friendliest and most pretentious welcomes ever extended a foreign visitor in the United States. Here are excerpts from a New York Times account of that event:
‘Premier Ahmed Ben Bella of Algeria received today a new kind of White House welcome with a 21-gun salute on the White House lawn. He also received President Kennedy’s assurances of support. . . . Throughout his visit, in public and private, Mr. Ben Bella has stressed Algeria’s pressing economic problems, her “nonalignment” and “anticolonialism” in foreign policy, and “socialism” in domestic policy. . . . At the White House ceremonies, Mr. Ben Bella noted that President Kennedy, as a Senator, endorsed self-rule for Algeria in 1957. . . . The President described Mr. Ben Bella, who spent five years in a French prison, as a strong patriot. . . . Mr. Ben Bella was the first foreign chief of state to be greeted by President Kennedy on the south lawn of the White House. The attendant honor guards, the Army Band, had to learn the Algerian national anthem, “Hassaman” from a recording. . . . and the varicolored flags of the 50 states were arrayed on the south lawn. Army trumpeters sounded a fanfare from the first-floor balcony of the White House. A 21- gun salute boomed out from the elipse only 750 feet away. The new arrangement stemmed from Mr. Kennedy’s desire to give Mr. Ben Bella a special welcome. . . . The ceremony was followed by a “business” meeting in the President’s office and a White House luncheon for Mr. Ben Bella. Among those present were Mohammed Khemisti, Algeria’s Foreign Minister. . . . Mr. Ben Bella thanked the President for the aid given since the French-Algerian peace accords were signed at Evian-les-Bains in March. . . . Several informed officials predicted that Algerian requests for Peace Corps teams, technical assistance, and possibly development loans, would get favorable consideration once the Algerians had worked out their own specific long-range economic plans. . . . Mr. Ben Bella . . . stayed at Blair House, the Presidential guest house.'”
Note in the following the New York Time’s respectful reference to Fidel Castro as Dr.Castro. Why didn’t the article mention the fact that Castro held mock trials and executed thousands of innocent Cubans when he seized power in 1959?
“The next day, October 16, 1962, Ben Bella went to Cuba, where he was given another 21-gun salute. Here are excerpts from a New York Times account of that event:
‘Premier Ahmed Ben Bella of Algeria arrived in Cuba today for a 24-hour state visit. Premier Fidel Castro used the occasion to make a vitriolic attack against the United States. Dr. Castro called Mr. Ben Bella’s visit in the face of “Yankee imperialist hostility” toward Cuba an “act of courage . . . a gesture which we will never forget. . . .” Mr. Ben Bella replied that every Algerian “knows, has loved and admired” the Castro revolution “in all its phases,” including its “extraordinary advances and progress despite the maneuvers of enemy forces. . . .” He said he was “truly happy” and “deeply moved” to visit Cuba and wished to express to Cubans and their government “our gratitude for the fraternal aid you gave us despite enormous difficulties.” Dr. Castro and his cabinet were at Jose Marti Airport as Mr. Ben Bella’s transport landed. Soviet-built tanks ringing the airport fired a 21-gun salute. Dr. Castro, with President Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado at his side, was the first to greet the Algerian leader. . . . Thousands of Cubans massed at the airport to welcome him, at Government orders. Flags and pennants fluttered. The cannon boomed as Dr. Castro and Mr. Ben Bella embraced, Latin-style, to wild applause. . . . An army band played the Cuban and Algerian national anthems. . . . The welcome exceeded that staged for Maj. Uri Gagarin, the Soviet astronaut, when he visited Cuba shortly after his space flight.’
The aid, for which Ben Bella publicly thanked Cuba, was nothing more than expressions of friendship. The aid which Ben Bella, the day before (in private), had thanked Kennedy for, was food grains and dairy products (valued at 47 million, 500 thousand dollars), plus 11,000 U.S. Army tents to house refugees, a U.S. Air Force 60-bed field hospital, 10 mobile health units, and a team of 25 doctors and staff on duty in an Algiers hospital.
On October 22, 1962 (one week after Ben Bella’s lavish reception at the White House), President Kennedy announced his quarantine of Cuba.
On October 23, 1962, the State Department instructed the Agency for International Development (foreign aid agency ) to suspend formal plans and discussions for economic aid to Algeria. The ‘apparent reason’ (according to a New York Times news story, quoting unnamed American officials) was State Department displeasure over Ben Bella’s visit to Cuba immediately after his visit with Kennedy.
This ‘apparent reason’ is not really very apparent, because President Kennedy and his State Department knew that Ben Bella would visit Cuba the day after his Washington reception.
On October 24, 1962, Ben Bella sided with Castro, urging the United States to abandon its naval base at Guantanamo.
On October 27, 1962, Ben Bella’s Council of Ministers issued a communique saying that the Cuban crisis had been caused by ‘United States action against Cuba.’
On that same day – October 27 – the New York Times learned (again, from unnamed officials) that the State Department had ordered resumption of the plans and discussions for United States aid to Algeria.”
Note the sequence of events. They were designed to confuse the American people, and conceal the fact that the U.S. was going to fund Ahmed Ben Bella’s communist regime.
“Speculating on this, the Dallas Morning News, in an editorial on November 6, 1962, said:
‘Could it be that two weeks ago (that is, when the State Department stopped the aid-to-Algeria talks) the State Department wasn’t sure that Ben Bella was in the enemy camp and didn’t want to waste U.S. aid on a nation which might turn out to be friendly?
When the chips were down, Algeria was against us. This proof of defiance apparently was sufficient to restore the State Department’s faith in Ben Bella, and to qualify Algeria for future U.S. aid.'”
Why did the U.S. topple General Chiang Kai-shek’s anti-communist regime in China (1949) , President Batista’s anti-communist regime in Cuba (1959) , President Somoza’s anti-communist regime in Nicaragua (1979) , the Shah’s anti-communist regime in Iran (1979) , Ian Smith’s anti- communist regime in Rhodesia (1980) , and the anti-communist regimes in Nepal, South Africa, Southwest Africa, and Angola?
“The (Dallas Morning-ed) News raises an interesting point: do we give our aid to the ‘underdeveloped’ nations because their leaders are communists who have proven their hatred of the United States and of capitalism?”
I suggest you re-read this letter, and ask yourself why the U.S. State Department decided to help Ahmed Ben Bella when it was apparent that he was in the communist camp. You can’t grasp the significance of any of the major political events that have taken place since World War II unless you recognize the existence of the communist-capitalist alliance, and understand the occult force that energizes the alliance.
There is a great deal of additional information in the November 12, 1962, Dan Smoot Report. Single copies of that publication are available to subscribers upon request. The Communist-Capitalist Alliance booklet is available for $3.95 each + shipping, or 25 copies for $49.95 + shipping. The booklet includes the letters from March through June 2007. If you would like to copy and distribute the letters yourself, you have my permission. We must continue trying to awaken the American people as to the danger we face.
The Establishment-controlled media has toned down their discussion of an imminent war between the U.S. and Iran, but I still fear it is only a matter of time before it occurs. Please pray that I am wrong because that would precipitate a financial crisis, collapse the stock market, devalue the dollar, and possibly destroy “the reserve status” of our currency. I suggest you make your plans accordingly.
President Bush claims he can’t secure the southern border or enforce U.S. immigration laws because the U.S. Senate rejected his Amnesty Bill. Approximately three days after the Bill was rejected, London police discovered two amateur car bombs, and the following day two Asian men ignited their car in the airport in Glasgow, Scotland. Will there be similar bombings in the U.S. because the American people rejected President Bush’s amnesty legislation?
We must press onward because we have no other course to follow. Remember Winston Churchill’s prophetic admonition:
“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” 
Our weapons are truth and righteousness, because we follow our Lord.
Barbara and I appreciate your faithful support, and your continued prayers
Yours in Christ,
1.The Dan Smoot Report, November 12, 1962, Vol. 8, No. 46, p. 361-362.
2. Ibid., p. 362.
3. Ibid., pp. 361-365.
4. Most of the books are available from Radio Liberty by calling 800-544-8927. Antony Sutton’s trilogy, “Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development” is available from the Hoover Institution, or www.Amazon.com
5. Ben Bagdikian, The New Media Monopoly, Beacon Press, 2004, p. 27.
6. http://newsblaze.com/story/20060318153820nnnn.nb/topstory.html p. 3.
7. Herbert Hoover, The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover: Years of Adventure 1874-1920, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1952, p. 420.
8. http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/02/04/05_killing.html p.1.
9. http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2002/fall/berlin-black-market-l.html p.4.
10. www.radioliberty.com, March 2007 letter.
11. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EK26Df03.html p.2.
12. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,2100698,00.html p. 1.
13. Report: Institute of Pacific Relations, Eighty-Second Congress: Copy available from Radio Liberty.
14. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8936 pp. 3-4.
15. http://www/answers.com/topic/anastasio-somoza-debayle p. 5.
16. Jim Hoagland, “In Iran, Feeling the Heat,” The Washington Post National Weekly Edition, April 23-29, 2007, p.5.
17. http://www.capmag.com/articles.asp?ID=409 p.1.
18. http://jpetrie.myweb.uga.edu/bulldog.html p.5.
Source: Radio Liberty